Thursday, November 3, 2011

A Non-Humorous Guide to Dealing with the Spot-Fixing Verdicts

Before you begin, allow me to apologise for this glorified rant, which is quite emotional, and rather profane. I don't apologise for how I feel though, so take that as you will)


 To begin with get off your moral fucking high horse. There is a prevalent sense that the cricketers deserved what they got. I can't disagree with the idea that their actions merited punishment, but to pass judgment from up high on their depravity isn't just ironic, it's a dangerous delusion. 

Corrupt practices are rampant within our society, largely borne out of its reliance on patronage. I have repeatedly invoked the hypocrisy of disobeying traffic laws by all and sundry because it represents the clearest example of a law everyone flouts. But it doesn't end there - jobs, loans, licenses, visas are regularly procured through contacts.

People who are currently passing judgement live on land stolen from Karachi's macheras or Lahore's bastis. And while we’re at it, buying cut price smuggled goods, or exploiting the ridiculously inhumane conditions of our labour force to feed and clothe yourself, or indeed to stay in fancy hotels are also fabulously immoral.

And oh yeah, every time you puff a fat one or drown your sorrows, or even watch a blue ray version of the new Scorcese or even Shahrukh, you’re committing a crime.

These men were a product of our own society. To pretend that their actions constitute evil while your own are borne out of inconvenience is precisely the sort of denial that allows such practices to take root.

Secondly, fuck the po-po.

Or to put it less eloquently, the justice system. As much as introspection is the primary response to this issue, an unquiet rage isn't far behind.

How so?

Forget the fact that other sportsmen have been convicted of fixing without receiving jail terms.

What leaves me all sore and blue is that Salman Butt gets 30 months, while Mazhar Majeed gets 32. That's like sentencing a drug dealer the same amount as the local don.

Butt and the others brought the game in disrepute, but their punishments are added to their sporting bans and the social cost of public and professional disgrace.

But if their punishment is proportional then how are we to make sense of Majeed's sentence: a man who exists as one of the vital functionaries of a global criminal syndicate whose dealings are conservatively estimated at $50 billion?

It seems to tell cricketers that fixing will lead to an end to their careers, while bookies face only a short pause in pursuing their line of work. If it's argued that the rulings were in line with the law then I'm afraid this rancid injustice stems from the entire system.
But I won't be resorting to any hollow slogans railing against said system, because they are an affront to the honesty of my emotions.

To my mind, this ruling represents the same attitude shown towards rogue financial traders - heavy punishment for individuals which can help distract from any uncomfortable questions being asked of the institutions.

And finally, there is hope.

In the 1982 football World Cup, Italy stormed to a memorable win after a sluggish start. The Azzuri’s triumph was engineered by the goals of the waifish Paolo Rossi. Rossi's inclusion in the squad had been controversial since he'd just come off a two-year ban for match fixing. Perhaps it's my biased mind clutching wildly at straws but the similarities with Amir are striking.

Like Amir there was a feeling with Rossi that his naivety had played in his involvement. While Rossi always claimed his innocence, and his conviction was a lot dodgier than Amir’s straightforward guilty plea, there remains a sense of a young, talented sportsman caught in the machinations of sinister men.

What I sincerely hope for is that like Rossi, when Amir has completed his sentence we can all agree that's he's paid for his crimes and welcome him back. It won't be a closure we deserve, because I doubt we'll be changing or even accepting our failings. And it's one that neither Asif nor Butt will likely enjoy because their age, and in Asif’s case prior misadventures, will most likely end any options they might ever have.

But I believe Amir will return, and he will return a hero, because that is a closure he deserves. I don’t want to strike away the severity of his actions, but as several people have pointed out, this young boy was failed as much by his own choices as he was by us.

He, and countless others like him, were failed by a society which forever revels in the exploits of its cricketers, forever uses them as a source of catharsis as pride, forever uses them to construct it’s own identity without providing any institutional safeguards, or indeed any role models to emulate. A cricketer is forever afflicted by chronic insecurity, always a Chairman’s ego or a politician’s grandstanding away from losing their job, or even being banned for life. It’s a bullshit situation to be in, and one that needs to be changed.

There are already a host of narratives emerging which will seek to rationalise this moment, this scandal, in order to allow everyone else to go on with their lives and pretend they have nothing to think about. 

Don’t be a chutiya and join their bandwagon.

24 comments:

  1. Exactly. Exactly the frakking thing I have been ranting about. We're all criminals, all of us are filthy criminals. Well written bhai.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Amen to the last few paragraphs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. awesome post :D and nice analogy with Rossi

    ReplyDelete
  4. KarachiKhatmal.. this is the ultimate blogpost there could be on dealing with the spot-fixing blues! Very human and very sensible.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Many thanks, Bro for writing this piece!
    There were no better words for him than "I Delivered that no-ball" and the same is true for this!

    Thanks A lot!

    ReplyDelete
  6. While i do agree with you that Amir has paid for what he did, justifying what he did on the basis of what our qaum does, is irrational.

    While an individual who violates the traffic light is as much reprehensible as the player who fixes the match, the consequences are more severe in the latter case because it has much more far reaching impact, and this is what EVERY celebrity should realize.
    I am not justifying the verdict, God knows i feel guilty in my heart, but here in Pakistan we lift people to that celebrity status so quickly that they hardly have time to adopt to the new life style and its ramifications.
    We might be a nation of culprits, but at least a traffic violating citizen has the sense to stop and look for any warden.
    What they did was just plain stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  7. All crimes aren't equal. If they were, then Majeed's sentence being almost the same as the boys' would be fine with you. Similarly, breaking a red light or having a beer is different from taking a bribe to fix a match. So you kinda contradicted yourself there.

    The boys were grown up enough to know right from wrong. Feeling bad for them doesn't help anyone. Judging them harshly means this bullshit won't happen again.Or at least right away.

    Now how do we get the Fakmal Brothers. You just know this is all their masterminding.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Manan:

    I think the point is that we know that even if the warden catches us, we pay him a bribe and that's that. with these guys, they weren't caught by the ACSU. as Pakistanis I would imagine that they also knew keh in ACSU walon se bachna hai. they were eventually caught by a newspaper i.e. the warden they didn't know existed. and that's what i'm saying - our society says that the consequences only matter if you can't pay/use a contact to get out of it. and that's the issue where i feel we lose the right to condemn them, because most of us operate on those same frameworks of morality.

    Anon 12.04:

    My point reads as a contradiction i agree. but it's a complaint based to two different systems. within our system, i feel it's wrong to pass judgement when all of us are so used to breaking laws and getting away with it. when it comes to the punishment meted out by the british system, my complaint to them is that it doesn't seem at all proportionate to go after the players heavily, but not the bookie. i hope that makes sense.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Rubbish. If you're wondering why this whole mess has everyone's knickers in a twist, ask yourself first why you felt compelled to write this post. Feel that emotion right there? THAT'S what cricket means to this country. That's why every asshole who was running traffic lights was also checking what the verdict was.

    I don't think people really care about the money: Pakistanis tend to assume that everyone makes money where they shouldn't be and they routinely use that to justify their own corruption. But don't throw fucking matches, dude. Don't do that. That's rotten to the core. There are millions of us who haven't placed bets on matches but are glued to our screens, wearing green and white, not doing other infinitely more productive things because we really, really want to see you PLAY. Don't mess with that.

    These guys and others like them, some of whom should be under investigation but are instead getting promotions, are in a position to break an entire country's fucking hearts, man. That should count for something. So yeah, fuck them.

    And one of our biggest moral weaknesses, btw, is that we keep making excuses for corrupt people and people who betray our trust by bringing them back into the field so they can do it all a.g.a.i.n. So YOU get off your moral high horse and do a bit of introspection as well.

    Agree that the bookie should've gotten way more of a punishment. Clear miscarriage of justice there. But the rest of your post was bullshit, I'm sorry to say.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Great rationale. Since we all cheat and lie, none of us should be punished. And when someone does get punished, lets say that its wrong! Hallelujah to the culture of cheating and match fixing!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Okay so you did not allow me to remain a silent reader. After reading this i had no other choice to change my silent reader status.
    Well written boy, and i hope whatever you have said at the end of thepiece become true.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Right for the most part but you exhibit a poor understanding of how the judicial system works. As it is, crimes carry prescribed minimum and maximum sentences giving the judge an amount of discretion. The judge may use said discretion for one or more of many accepted reasons be it, age, culpability, plea of guilt, prior history, understanding of the gravity of the situation, personal attributes and conditions of the defendant and others.

    Mazhar Majeeds sentence may be smaller in comparison to Butt( it is quite long compared to the 2 bowlers) because Butt was defiant till the very end while majeed had pleaded guilty. Also Butt can be understood to have a greater involvement in coercing or convincing the 2 bowlers to bowl no-balls. Further he had a greater responsibility on his shoulders as captain than Majeed had as an agent and should there be said that Amir being a first time offender succumbed to peer pressure then Butt stands to be the prime culprit.

    So theres several things that a court factors in. Little wonder Butt got a longer sentence.
    To sum up I believe majeed was shown leniency for his cooperation and Butt was targeted due to his refusal to cooperate

    ReplyDelete
  13. U like-minded bastard! U echoed my thoughts!

    ReplyDelete
  14. You keep waiting for moments when the inbred lynch mob comes out of it's closet. Today was one of those rarest days. God help a moral pious Adam define a fucking line between a crime and it's punishment.

    ReplyDelete
  15. As much as the senses want to delve into believing he will come back, it's just not fitting in. The post amputation phase could be blamed for it or the residual letting go of it months long attempts, but even the minor recesses of the brain don't take it anymore. But life teaches us in stranger ways..

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I totally understand where are you coming from. Amir, Asfi and Butt are as much like us , as we are like them. Our society should share the blame.

    But, what if somebody comes up to you and says Pakistan's are cheat? Should you swallow your pride( whatever thats left of it).

    Or we are as much cheats as Warne, Azhar, Mark, Cronje,
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Match_fixing#Match_fixing_incidents

    I just can't see the wisdom here. what is there to learn?

    ReplyDelete
  18. I wish we can be more open minded about our failures as a person or as a society. I will welcome Muhammad Aamir when he returns to the international cricket because unlike our movies the person who wears black is always not the villian.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Agreed. And I really hope Amir makes a comeback. Not saying that these guys are innocent, but what has happened here is what happens all the time in Pakistan. The only difference was these 3 got caught.
    That does not mean that it is fine and we should praise them for their actions, it is not. But before one starts straw-manning the whole thing, have more empathy and realize that most people in that situation coming from our conditions may as well have succumbed to the same crimes.
    And this is no competition of whether Pakistan produces the most corrupted cricketers or another country does, some things matter on a deeper level than stupid superficial allegations and reputations. For example, these cricketers suffering a country-wide hostility is not a good tradeoff regardless of their mistakes, that is not fair treatment on any level.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Zeesh, Maheen, Awami Lota, Rai Azlan, Forbidden Fruit, Saadie:

    Thanks a lot my lovelies :)

    Aaf, Anon, Saad:

    You guys made differing points, but I've tried to sum up a collective response, which goes like this.

    when I wrote it I didn't have many facts in front of me, and I was very emotional as well. I was told by since then about the intention of the courts/police to go after Majeed for other cases as well, which makes that point about his and Butt's sentencing invalid. However, the reason I came up with it in the first place is because I have a strong mistrust of the system to go after the greater malaise.

    To see what I mean, in the two years I've lived here (in the UK) there has been both the expenses scandal with the MPs and the phone-hacking scandal and despite their gravity and the fact that they occurred in institutions where trust is the most important thing, there were barely any punishments meted out save for some resignations. In the same time, the student protests and riots took place, where young kids with no priors were given harsh jail terms for first offences which included bullshit like climbing a statue or breaking a window. And it's not just the UK - you see over in the US as well how Big Money repeatedly survives the kind of scrutiny and punishment that little guys get.

    That being said, I don't want to say that these guys shouldn't have been punished. Let me repeat that - they needed to be punished. What pisses me off is that the rest of us look down upon them and pretend to be all holy. Ninja please. Forget the whole of the country, anyone with the resources to speak English fluently and have access to the internet (i.e. the chattering classes) has benefited from untold privileges and small corruptions. To give an example, using a fake Windows XP or buying a DVD from Rainbow Market are also crimes and hence shouldn't be committed. This is my main contention - I hate people pontificating about how these boys let us down etc etc. I know what they did was wrong, and I will say it a 100 times, but I'm gonna bitchslap the next bastard who zips around in their sifarish-acquired life passing judgement.

    I went to the court in London for just one session, where Asif was being questioned. When it was over, he just walked back like a playa, shrugged his shoulders, and cracked a joke with the translator even though he had been reamed for the past two hours. And it hit me that this fucker had in his short career beaten a drugs charge and a doping charge and various minor misdemeanours, and that while I was shitting my pants for him, he didn't have a care in the world. And while I was describing this to my wife, she mentioned how this is the way we treat our men - tumhari koi ghalti nahi hai or that koi na koi rasta nikal aaye ga. That's something I see all around me in my generation, despite us being educated, and that's what I wish Amir's generation can be saved from. If that means a deterrent, so that his attitude changes, so be it. He's at the age where he can come back and still have a lot to give.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Also, two guys, look them up: Bruce Grobelaar and John Higgins.

    ReplyDelete
  22. You are a fucking idiot with severely compromised moral values and a skewed worldview.

    Get help.

    ReplyDelete
  23. i honestly think this is a case of nothing more than the white man sticking it to the brown man... again. And primarily coz the whiteys couldnt handle amirs bowling.

    ReplyDelete
  24. a dominant theme in our national lives is that we as pakistanis love each other. we're one big happy family and each one of us wants everyone else to be happy. we say that if you are a pakistani, it is my duty to love and respect you.

    in reality we don't think any of those things. this is borne out, for instance, by the fact that at rush hour, we want first of all to get to wherever we are going, even if it means that someone else gets late. do we honestly think such people will value another's life over their own?

    we don't love each other. we have our own personal interests and that is fine. anyone telling you its a moral imperative or a religious duty that you sacrifice for someone else is probably trying to manipulate you, or is seriously misguided. do what you want and don't feel bad about it. if we walk five steps we trample a hundred ants under our feet. just because you're a talking ape doesn't mean the whole world should revolve around you.

    when someone tells you to first of all 'be a pakistani'. tell them to fuck off. you're you. and that's all.

    ReplyDelete

Please... Enlighten me