no really, take a look at it.
are you suppressing a giggle, or perhaps recalling the awesome article on cracked.com that showcased this once?
this picture, and i am not mincing my words here, explains why the burqa/hijab and its politics are such a huge issue in our modern world.
no really, take a look at it, and you should see be able to see it.
still don't get it, do you?
let me tell you a story.
there used to be two tribes, one in the east and one in the west.
the men of both tribes would gather every day to perform their rituals. in the east, they would inhale gas. in the west, they would imbibe liquids.
the men of the east said that our faith is in something that can not be seen or measured readily, but can be felt. so our ritual centers around gas, because it is what exemplifies our faith.
the men of the west said that our faith is in something we can see and know and measure, so our rituals are based on liquids.
one day the men in the east realised that the tribes of the west had built big buildings and fancy roads and phones you could touch instead of tap, and it made them very upset.
some of them thought, hey, why not give this liquid idea a try. so with heads filled with up with gases they started to give this liquid thing a shot
but other men of the east got really pissed, so pissed that they started filling themselves up with gas until they blew up. they didn't realise that they were in on the liquid too, because their denial was so powerful.
interestingly, the women of the east had no choice on the matter but to keep up the rituals that had always existed.
one year the tribe in the west started running out of its liquid, and suddenly there was great commotion and despair. some of them shouted that the men in the east had probably finished off all their liquid, siphoning it into their dirty gaseous minds. all hell broke lose, as the tribe vowed to get their liquid back, and to make sure that no gas-guzzling easterner would ever get to sip any liquid until they provided permission.
cue chaos and confusion.
cue, this picture.
why do i keep returning here? well, i had seen this image a few times on the web, and my reactions had ranged from the incredulity of being confronted with pakistanica, to embarrasment at our tackiness, to titlation based on my desire to feel different. but i'd never quite understood it.
then, i visited the british museum, and suddenly i saw this, and it floored me.
to be honest, i actually saw a version of this image where the king was actually stabbing the lion through the skull with a dagger, but even here, you can make out the fight with the lion resulting in a stab wound for the beast.
it made a very strong and obvious point - this image is of a hero.
heroes in all mythologies kill lions to prove their valour. in one image, that poster tells me everything i need to know about who sultan rahi is, and the moral world he inhabits.
now, perhaps it seems like a huge leap to link the persepolis image with the pakistani one as either ends of a tradition, but i have reasons.
you may claim i am simply doing so to root this piece of faux-art onto a venerable tradition. you may even say that the reason i do so is to find a rooting in history for my country and its culture, which suffers from such absurd amnesias in definig its own past.
but i am doing it because it makes sense. it makes sense because of trucks.
truck art has become this symbol and motif of showcasing non-terrorist pakistan.
its this idea that 'we have culture too', although most people who use it do it to add some ethnic flavour to their own ideals. they do it without ever understanding it, but only showcasing it like a circus shows a bearded woman.
infact, if i may say so, truck art is the most exoticized pakistani object after mathira's body.
what makes things interesting is if you try and investiage why trucks in pakistan are decorated the way they are, you find something revelatory.
almost every aspect of truck art, from the way those giant d-shaped crowns are created, to the patterns and motifs inscribed, to the very idea of decoration itself, stems from traditions in islamic art.
essentially, artistic traditions organic to this area and region which have just morphed from buildings and canvases onto truck bodies.
which is why the sultan rahi poster itself fits in with the persian king - both of those are part of certain ideas and traditions.
what is worrying is that i had no idea about any of this.
and i'm not alone here.
we've all found ourselves in the position where we are unsure whether to take gulps of gas or shots of liquid. and by we, i don't mean western-boot licking liberals, i mean all the tribesmen of the east, because when you use a mobile phone to blow up the infidels, well you're using the products of liquid faith.
but as we rushed to bathe ourselve in liquid, we did not consider that perhaps liquid and gas could have a synthesis, or that gas may have something to say about liquid or vice versa. so eager were we to reap the benefits of liquid that we felt the best way forward was to pretend gas never existed.
which is why a 27 year old film graduate had no way of understanding the imagery of a local film, because that whole world view had been replaced a long time ago.
and unfortunately, while the men of the east gave up their traditional forms of dressing and their traditional occupations and thoughts, they could never really let go of the idea of tradition itself. they just reduced it to certain symbols that proved to themselves that they were still a gas.
and so, cue the hijab, cue halal kfc, cue men dressed in jeans and working in investment banks who feel that women who don't cover up are asking to be raped.
in this post 9/11 climate of mosques floating upon grounds of zero and sikhs being thrashed for their turbans and newspaper comics becoming nuclear bombs, we find ourselves in an odd position.
the west doesn't 'hate' us, it just doesn't get us.
and they don't get us because we don't get ourselves. the reason we don't get ourselves is because we don't know what was ours to begin with. like this image.
i'm not trying to make this a pedantic debate about islam and the west, or the perils of modernity, and i am certainly not advocating a return to the stone ages.
what i am trying to say, is that when you and i don't know what sultan rahi is doing stabbing two lions in the head, its not because we were never interested in that lollywood crap to begin with, but because we have no clue how to decode and interpret the symbols that are organic to us.
because somewhere in the past few centuries, we oscillated between trying to buy into modernity and trying to retain our own identity. and in doing so, we made the disastrous decision to ape the liquid drinkers in the areas we needed to, and spurn their logic when their ideas meant our own privilieges would be threatened. that meant that our own traditions and logic and worldviews literally vanished in thin air, leaving us gasping for breath.
and in today's world, where suddenly all of us - from the talib in swat to the student in swarthmore, are finding ourselves like the kawa with the peacock feathers, we have no idea where to turn and what to look at. because what we see, we don't understand.
and if we can't understand our own selves out, no amount of development funds, sympathetic op-eds, well meaning NGOs and facebook protests can save us from our self-inflicted destruction.
















Dude I want your brain. Super awesome post
ReplyDeleteshahid:
ReplyDeletehaha
to be honest, the whole idea is almost a complete plagiarism of something my wife told me last night. i just added the pictures and the sultan rahi :)
Beautiful you've acknowledged cracked.com's existence, gotta write something about it since I've been lurking there for like two and a half years.
ReplyDeleteOn a technical note; the cross-eyed kid from Life's archives doesn't show up properly.
Ahmer, yaar...awesome.
Our own self destructiveness and it's effects are what keeps me filling up my blog spaces. Admitting a problem is step one on moving to the road to recovery.
Anything else to add about Pakistani Self-Destructiveness?
tlw:
ReplyDeletemany thanks yaar :) there is something addictive to this whole self destructive business - keep finding myself on that same road. but pessimism aside, the great part of this journey is that we get to discover our own pasts. i can't describe how exhilarating it felt when i first read that truck art article i linked above. self-realization is quite magical.
reading this felt like watching an acrobat jump on trapeze... a bad writer trying to cover so much space would definitely have fallen to ground, but not you my friend... very well written, that is.
ReplyDeletealso, I find it interesting that while you interpret why sultan rahi is stabbing lions, you completely overlook the title of the poster, which i think is quite ironic, even perplexing. I mean, dharti sheraN di means the land of lions, and the poster shows two lions being stabbed in their skulls! what the hell is that supposed to mean?
also, noticeable is the fact that while the old pictures/carvings show a man fighting one lion/bison (as if in a wrestling match), sultan rahi is fighting two of them.
Add the euphoric expression on sultan rahi's face to these observations and the poster seems to suggest nothing but petty casual violence....
After all, there is nothing surprising or novel about comparing a man's strength to that of a lion, is there? but the exaggeration of that strength in the style of an ambidextrously violent superman does say something about the peculiar interpretation of a traditional metaphor in our contemporary culture.
Interesting post, but I think you under-estimate us.
ReplyDeletePlenty of people, live and breath the east, sometimes they even identify with and analyze it to death.
I think at the end of the day its not that we don't get us, its more about we don't do jack to promote us. We are too lazy and blase to make a difference.
But kudos for introducing me to Mathira, like what the hey!
And also, I want your wife's brain!
Didn't like the post Ahmer - you are trying to answer a really broad question and I don't think your reference to the Sultan Rahi poster suffices in getting your point across. Also, I don't think our inability to understand ourselves has anything to do with the dichotomy between East and West. Or maybe I just don't get what you are trying to say. Either way, maybe you can enlighten me further :)
ReplyDelete"they dont get us because we dont get ourselves"
ReplyDeletenicely written...
Kamal ker diya, KK jee! Baat kehnay aur dikhanay ka fun koi aap say seekhay!
ReplyDeleteInterersting but more like a gigsaw puzzle. I really have to keep my wits about while reading this intricate psot.
ReplyDeleteThe liquid-gas analogy reminds me of a beautiful kalaam, "Tum Ek Gorakh Dhanda Ho'.
ReplyDelete"Hairaan hoon iss baat par tum kaun ho kya ho, haath aao toh buth, haath na aao toh khuda ho"
>and they don't get us because we don't get >ourselves. the reason we don't get ourselves is >because we don't know what was ours to begin with.
ReplyDeleteAnd we ought to think of Sher Shah Suri and the legend behind his name, before running off to Persepolis ;-)
I enjoy your symbolbaazi but like Natalia, I'm totally confused here.
rabab:
ReplyDelete"but the exaggeration of that strength in the style of an ambidextrously violent superman does say something about the peculiar interpretation of a traditional metaphor in our contemporary culture."
there is no doubt that the image overdoes the masculinity etc, and its ripe with symbolism and aspirations of the target audience. i just wanted to show how to interpret it.
deuceexmachina: haha no one gets her brain, otherwise where would this blog go? also i think we love discussing the east, only our discussions miss the point, which is why we don't have the intellectual fortitude needed to promote them
bea, awais, jalal, vagabond: thanks! whatta lovely comment awais waisay
natalia, guppy: i admit there are huge leaps here in several places, but the basic point is this.
facing the superiority of the west, a lot of people in our culture tried to embrace their technologies, but not the logic and 'faith' (in rationality) that underpinned such things. this led to a situation where we would embrace modern banking, but not modern conventions of gender, since the former allowed us to make money, the latter would mean that our confused traditions of modesty and chastity would get offended. the point is not about a simple east v west thing, its more about how we've lost what our worldview meant, and we have never fully embraced the competing worldviews either. that leaves us confused. hope that helped.
I'm going to have to get a spliff before I try reading this again, but I think agree with your basic premise (at least as outlined in the above comment).
ReplyDeleteyour technology wala point is exemplified by our reverence of the middle east.
look at dubai, look at jeddah, look at bahrain, all those big big buildings with shiny shiny windows and silver silver gizmos.
somehow, we perceive, this place has melded east and west... its a place where technological advancement exists along "our values."
We end up confusing technology with modernity, and therefore, think its modern to emphasize our conservative values ala the Gulf.
PS.. This reverence of the gulf has creeped into our aesthetics as well... most "modern" buildings in Pakistan look like shitty versions of downtown Bahrain.
PPS (This all ties into my theory on why the Amir Liaquat is so popular--its his shiny rim-less glasses, which also look like shitty versions of downtown Bahrain).
But doesn't this go both ways? See, you drew me into this post really well and kept me there - I guess, unarguably, you're really good at wrapping lots of things into a fun while yet subtle narrative, but sometimes - like here - it seems to be a bit of a ramble. But then I guess blogs were practically made for rambles.
ReplyDeleteI mean, I saw that line about us not understanding ourselves coming. But you haven't pointed out that THEY (assuming we accept this east/west division of the world, which I find increasingly hard to accept and is a huge debate i'm sure you've had loads of times already,so I'll shut it)....THEY don't understand us EITHER, and that THEY are equally confused by mixing liquid and gas. I know you're aware of it - but this post feels incomplete without that perspective too.
I started reading you post. First I thought what am i reading? Then I thought wow its deep thought. Then after i finished reading i started to thing how come people think so deep and come up with such great post. Wonderful!!
ReplyDeleteraza:
ReplyDeleteamir liaqat's glasses as downtown bahrain - hahahha! you've said it all.
nsahmed:
i think as it is the reason the post had to be deliberately avoid making specific points was because the claims were very essentialist, and to get in to any more details would have gotten people quoting statistics and 'facts' to prove i was being wrong. the confusion on the other side was only slyly referred to. one of my main arguments is that the belief in rationality, regardless of how it is constructed, is held to by its adherents through faith, not through anything else. that in its self is something i need to come back to at some point.
asma:
many thanks :)
that's an interesting argument that does merit lots of deep thought and debate;I can tell that you're not a huge fan of rigorously applying the scientific method everywhere,but rationality is like this self-fulfilling prophecy because it keeps empirically proving itself,and so claiming that its empire is faith-based will be very tricky.
ReplyDeletemissing the point is half the fun...just keep the discussions alive.
ReplyDeleteUsing Sultan Rahi to prove your point was a great idea. Really a unique post. I have to admit seldom do we see concept that that. Cool dude!!!
ReplyDeleteWe are idiots! Bomb us next! Please kick our asses!!!
ReplyDeleteHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Brilliant, ultimate, PRICELESS!
What a brilliant post. I am disappointed that I did not discover your blog sooner. I landed here from dawn blog site. You have a brilliant with words and excellent and lucid way of presenting your thought.
ReplyDeleteI am from India myself and have been trying to disentangle the east vs west myself for a while now and its fascinating how you have explained it here. I notice same same differences in architecture, music , art and everything.
TO give an example if you took a picture of eastern market place in say india or pakistan and that of a market in west say in europe or america.. you would notice how everything is organized differently. In the east it would be bazar with people squating around and things tend to be rounded and organic. In the west it would be shops organized in sharp lines and some symmetry in it. I never understood why that is so.. its something inherent and since the west has colonized east in recent history its the bazar that tries to draw lines and pretend to be a western flea market that is confusing to both west and east.
I have noticed similar things in music as well but that would be for different post.
Thanks again and looking forward to reading and commenting on your other posts.
nabeel:
ReplyDelete"but rationality is like this self-fulfilling prophecy because it keeps empirically proving itself,and so claiming that its empire is faith-based will be very tricky."
i'm a bit lost here because faith is often self-fulfilling no?
dueceexmachina:
no doubt - comment boards are what bring a blog to life
talha, mumra:
thanks :) also that picture was something i found online, didn't make it myself
suresh:
many thanks :) i love your observation on the market place - its very apt. do write in about your ideas on music - its a very potent example of what we are discussing here.